So, it will be exciting to see what other imaginative ways McCall will come up with to disarm his opponents before he lays down the law upon them. In the hands of Robert McCall, even a corkscrew can become a weapon of destruction. The series has always depended on creativity and technical innovation when it comes to its fight scenes, more than the bombastic and explosive action seen in other Hollywood projects. The Equalizer series has always been known for its gritty and realistic action, and you can expect to see even more creative and intense fight sequences in the third film. In our review, we called the movie a “fitting send-off” to the action trilogy, that’s packed with “style, energy and cohesiveness that most sequels aren’t capable of.” The Action is Taken Up A Notch So when the opportunity came for Fuqua to direct Washington in the film adaptation of The Equalizer, it was a no-brainer that the film would turn out to be a masterpiece, and the success it received was almost expected considering their history of creating magic on the big screen.Īnd it seems the magic hasn’t faded one bit, with The Equalizer 3 already receiving high praise from critics. Ever since then, Fuqua has been a cornerstone in some of Washington's most successful films, making their duo one of the most highly regarded in Hollywood. Washington won an Academy Award for the 2001 film, Training Day, which was also directed by Fuqua, and his performance was widely appreciated for being subtle and effective. Washington’s Man On Fire co-star Dakota Fanning pops up for a subplot that goes nowhere, and the big payoff is so easily executed that it lacks any genuine thrills.The director and actor duo have worked together in numerous films, and have never failed to create magic. Fuqua presents ideas but never follows through with them. In actuality, The Equalizer 3 doesn’t explore much or say anything. We still cheer on his quest for justice, but there’s an eerie, almost unhinged level of depravity to his actions-he’s borderline psychotic, though the film never explores his lust for blood. Except, this time around, the action is largely hidden in shadows and presented with an ominous score that feels more appropriate for Michael Myers than Robert McCall. Here, Robert combats a ruthless drug dealer who uses farms to transport his product… ah, who cares? The bad guys exist so Robert can kick ass between his tea and coffee breaks. Where the pic falters is in its clunky script and lackluster villains. Washington’s charisma carries the film through its slower moments, while Fuqua makes the most of his gorgeous Southern Italy landscape. Hell, I enjoyed watching the man traverse a John Wick: Chapter 4-esque series of stairs to get himself back in shape. In fact, there were times I wished the movie wouldn’t resort to bloodshed and instead linger on Robert McCall’s relationship with his kindly doctor or that beautiful waitress. If the first two functioned as schlocky, violent, vigilante thrillers, Part 3 borrows its cues from the Ip Man franchise and mostly follows Washington’s world-weary assassin as he mingles with the local townsfolk.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |